Friday, April 26, 2024 Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 licence.

Andrew Wiles

« All quotes from this author
 

But what has made this problem special for amateurs is that there's a tiny possibility that there does exist an elegant 17th-century proof.

 
Andrew Wiles

» Andrew Wiles - all quotes »



Tags: Andrew Wiles Quotes, Authors starting by W


Similar quotes

 

When any good attitude or concept or system worked well, we hung onto it. We preserved representative democracy, intended for a time when only a few could get to the capital to speak for the many. Modern finance was designed in the 17th century. Literacy as a test of intelligence came in the 15th century. The idea of progress is 19th century. And yet, all of those things are part of our mental furniture today, because when the answer to a question -- a solution to a problem -- suits us, we kind of institutionalize it, so that it won't change even when we do. The business of questioning, itself, has been institutionalized like that, in the kind of place that Jodrell Bank telescope belongs to: a university.

 
James (science historian) Burke
 

He that fights and runs away
May live to fight another day. (17th Century?)

 
Anonymous
 

Of all the men who attacked the flying problem in the 19th century, Otto Lilienthal was easily the most important. ... It is true that attempts at gliding had been made hundreds of years before him, and that in the nineteenth century, Cayley, Spencer, Wenham, Mouillard, and many othcrs were reported to have made feeble attempts to glide, but their failures were so complete that nothing of value resulted.

 
Otto Lilienthal
 

Myths and legends die hard in America. We love them for the extra dimension they provide, the illusion of near-infinite possibility to erase the narrow confines of most men's reality. Weird heroes and mould-breaking champions exist as living proof to those who need it that the tyranny of 'the rat race' is not yet final.

 
Hunter S. Thompson
 

Elegance is necessarily unnatural, only achieveable at great expense. If you just do something, it won't be elegant, but if you do it and then see what might be more elegant, and do it again, you might, after an unknown number of iterations, get something that is very elegant.

 
Erik Naggum
© 2009–2013Quotes Privacy Policy | Contact