Monday, December 18, 2017
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 licence.

Daily updated quotes!

Hungarian-born Jewish American mathematician who made fundamental advances in the areas of probability theory, statistics, operator theory, ergodic theory, functional analysis, and mathematical logic.

Page **1** of **1**

What does it take to be [a mathematician]? I think I know the answer: you have to be born right, you must continually strive to become perfect, you must love mathematics more than anything else, you must work at it hard and without stop, and you must never give up.

The author discusses valueless measures in pointless spaces.

Mathematics is not a deductive science — that's a cliché. When you try to prove a theorem, you don't just list the hypotheses, and then start to reason. What you do is trial and error, experimentation, guesswork. You want to find out what the facts are, and what you do is in that respect similar to what a laboratory technician does. Possibly philosophers would look on us mathematicians the same way as we look on the technicians, if they dared.

André Weil suggested that there is a logarithmic law at work: first-rate people attract other first-rate people, but second-rate people tend to hire third-raters, and third-rate people hire fifth-raters. If a dean or a president is genuinely interested in building and maintaining a high-quality university (and some of them are), then he must not grant complete self-determination to a second-rate department; he must, instead, use his administrative powers to intervene and set things right. That's one of the proper functions of deans and presidents, and pity the poor university in which a large proportion of both the faculty and the administration are second-raters; it is doomed to diverge to minus infinity.

I read once that the true mark of a pro — at anything — is that he understands, loves, and is good at even the drudgery of his profession.

Don't just read it; fight it! Ask your own question, look for your own examples, dicover your own proofs. Is the hypothesis necessary? Is the converse true? What happens in the classical special case? What about the degenerate cases? Where does the proof use the hypothesis?

Page **1** of **1**

Hall, Evelyn Beatrice

Hall, John (Presbyterian pastor)

Hall, John S.

Hall, Joseph

Hall, Manly Palmer

Hall, Robert

Hall, Stuart

Halleck, Fitz-Greene

Halliburton, Richard

Halme, Tony

Halsey, William Bull

Hamann, Johann Georg

Hamasaki, Ayumi

Hamburger, Michael

Hamer, Fannie Lou

Hamilton Aide, Charles

Hamilton, Alexander

Hamilton, Anthony

Hamilton, Edith

Hall, John (Presbyterian pastor)

Hall, John S.

Hall, Joseph

Hall, Manly Palmer

Hall, Robert

Hall, Stuart

Halleck, Fitz-Greene

Halliburton, Richard

Halme, Tony

**Halmos, Paul**

Halsey, William Bull

Hamann, Johann Georg

Hamasaki, Ayumi

Hamburger, Michael

Hamer, Fannie Lou

Hamilton Aide, Charles

Hamilton, Alexander

Hamilton, Anthony

Hamilton, Edith

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M

N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

- Age
- Anger
- Art
- Beauty
- Business
- Change
- Death
- Dreams
- Education
- Experience
- Faith
- Family
- Forgiveness
- Friendship
- Happiness
- Health
- History
- Home
- Humor
- Imagination
- Intelligence
- Leadership
- Life
- Love
- Marriage
- Men & Women
- Money
- Movie
- Music
- Nature
- Parenting
- Peace
- People
- Power
- Pet
- Politics
- Religion
- Sadness
- Science
- Society
- Sports
- Success
- Technology
- Time
- Trust
- War
- Wisdom
- Work