Saturday, April 20, 2024 Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 licence.

Italo Calvino

« All quotes from this author
 

In an age when other fantastically speedy, widespread media are triumphing and running the risk of flattening all communication onto a single, homogeneous surface, the function of literature is communication between things that are different simply because they are different, not blunting but even sharpening the differences between them, following the true bent of the written language.
--
Six Memos for the Next Millennium (1988)
--
English translation: Patrick Creagh (1996)

 
Italo Calvino

» Italo Calvino - all quotes »



Tags: Italo Calvino Quotes, Authors starting by C


Similar quotes

 

When language is used without true significance, it loses its purpose as a means of communication and becomes an end in itself.

 
Karl Jaspers
 

The dictionary definition of communication [...] includes the communication of goods and supplies. [...] But transport of goods is not communication in the sense we are adopting here, and does not raise the same subtle and difficult questions. What "goods" do we exchange when we send messages to one another?

 
Colin Cherry
 

To understand how indirect communication is possible we must grasp what it is about ordinary communication that is being changed.

 
David (philosopher) Wood
 

I was running from my own thoughts as much as anything. I simply wanted to untangle myself from the web I had touched. A single, sticky, quivering strand of it was all I needed to warn me away. I did not want to think about people. I wanted the trees, the scents and colors, the shifting shadows of the wood, which spoke a language I understood. I wished I could simply disappear in it, live like a bird or a fox through the winter, and leave the things I had glimpsed to resolve themselves without me.

 
Patricia A. McKillip
 

Would not all we mean by “communication between mind and mind” be provided for if we suppose that common knowledge comes about, not from our explaining things to one another, but from things explaining themselves in the same terms to us all? Accepting the object as its own interpreter, as its own “medium of communication,” do we not begin to understand what is utterly dark on any other view, how it comes to pass that the resulting knowledge is a common possession?

 
L. P. Jacks
© 2009–2013Quotes Privacy Policy | Contact