Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 licence.

Derrick Jensen

« All quotes from this author
 

Perception creates behavior. Perception encourages behavior. And because this institution--this artifice--continues to socially reinforce patterns of perception and behavior, if this behavior is destructive, it may not be a bad idea to eliminate or curtail the institution.
--
p. 50

 
Derrick Jensen

» Derrick Jensen - all quotes »



Tags: Derrick Jensen Quotes, Authors starting by J


Similar quotes

 

...the perception of potential threats to survival may be much more important in determining behavior than the perceptions of potential profits, so that profit maximization is not really the driving force. It is fear of loss rather than hope of gain that limits our behavior

 
Kenneth Boulding
 

Synergy means behavior of whole systems unpredicted by the behavior of their parts taken seperately.

 
Buckminster Fuller
 

In general, an implementation must be conservative in its sending behavior, and liberal in its receiving behavior.

 
Jon Postel
 

Before we can proceed to a formal definition of conflict we must examine another concept, that of behavior space. The position of a behavior unit at a moment of time is defined by a set of values (subset, to be technical) of a set of variables that defines the behavior unit. These variables need not be continuous or quantitatively measurable. The different values of a variable must, however, be capable of simple ordering; that is, of any two values it must be possible to say that one is 'after' (higher, lefter, brighter than) the other.

 
Kenneth Boulding
 

The trouble with the canons of scientific evidence [...] is that they virtually rule out the description of anything but oft-repeated, oft-observed, stereotypic behavior of a species, and this is just the sort of behavior that reveals no particular intelligence at all - all this behavior can be more or less plausibly explained as the effects of some humdrum combination of "instinct" or tropism and conditioned response. It is the novel bits of behavior, the acts that couldn't plausibly be accounted for in terms of prior conditioning or training or habit, that speak eloquently of intelligence; but if their very novelty and unrepeatability make them anecdotal and hence inadmissible evidence, how can one proceed to develop the cognitive case for the intelligence of one's target species?

 
Daniel C. Dennett
© 2009–2013Quotes Privacy Policy | Contact